Energy is blurred, until it is directed to methods and processes. This is particularly true when the energy produced by the individual effort of a large corporation trying to realize the function of engineering. Just as the circuits, analog devices direct the flow of energy, the methods and processes used to direct the flow of work, energy, large and small. Effectiveness of the methods developed for the implementation of tasks and the commitment of workers to the figures of the organization of the company's operations. No organization should try to produce a product or service without reliable systems are checked daily operations. Many organizations are not groped for such feats, and this has caused quality problems in many companies today. Time limits and other requirements are not acceptable excuses for sacrificing discipline.
Systems, processes and methods are always a great impact on the success or failure of IT projects. The project's success is not inevitable. People who assume the role of software development in IT services should consider the possibility of one or more steps in a method adopted is unsuitable for a particular application. This is where we find improvements and new approaches to solving the problems that have been learned by experience.
The systems are divided into manageable chunks to accommodate an entrepreneurial approach to development. This means that the process is divided into tasks performed by team members.
Each team member takes responsibility for its work and develop their own strategic plan for the implementation of their work.
Those who play SD in organizations must have a commitment to the process that orchestrates the way things are done on a daily basis, then they can not be hardened by the process inefficient procedures that hamper the performance went unnoticed . There are occasions where a method is part of a process is not relevant for one reason or another. There must be room for improvement is governed by guidelines that do not impede progress.
If a method of analysis can not be enforced due to certain limitations, the lack of this method should be recognized and excluded when the tension is in the initial conditions, time constraints for example could be something impossible to achieve in the time allocated to a task.
When effective processes are in place solutions implemented are insignificant compared to what was originally presented to engineering and IT teams. The request is submitted to the IT department can not usually be converted directly into design activities. Management team are the sources of information on issues of new products and features are not present in the requirements from the point of view that engineers can use the functional design. The purpose of the standard processes to standardize these requirements, and when this happens the solutions are much easier to find.
Place the process of digesting the information presented to the Department and distributed to parts of the organization is responsible for the work.
The work of this knowledge is distributed the same work that implements the solution. Those who hold the functions of software development are the organs of the system that does the job. They should have a clear understanding of their responsibilities and participate in the process.
The process can be measured by how well it solves a problem. Future needs in the IT department creates a chaotic reaction if the process used by engineers are not powerful enough to regulate and establish the terms of the information is moved around the department. If the procedures are low, there would be redundant information, duplication of requirements and needs for change that leads to complex dependencies.
The core of the data received by the department is required. Standardization of data sent to the department must be sufficiently effective to avoid the problems mentioned above and the results used to create more granular functional design. In the IT services of these documents contain the information requirements necessary for the application types such as C + + modules, classes and abstractions.
Sometimes, there is no established process in place. I worked for over an organization that believes that the formal development process was not necessary because their projects were not sufficiently large or complex or that the engineers were so clever they can work without the process that the regulated development.
I was criticized for trying to implement a formal strategies of technology, even for my own work. The result of not having a system that has been chaos in all cases, poor quality and performance, but it turned out that many companies in this chaos has been accepted as a normal state of the department.
In addition, small businesses, top management teams (mostly managers involved in process control and development) has lost control and authority of the services and products offered by the company and the engineers control almost everything.
Information systems to move in organizations and how they are constructed, is a strong indicator of the willingness of senior management to retain control of the organization.
When knowledge is not distributed properly due to poor process and lack of commitment from top management to lose control because they will be able to track the performance of system design or coordinate the activities within the company.
For example, each design document contains the knowledge necessary for effective management of the milestones set and goals that are specific enough to measure performance. By not requiring the department of engineering work within a system that produces and distributes its development data throughout the enterprise, the company becomes virtually all technical controls for developers.
This is not good, because each department must be open to cross-checks and inspectors from the outside. The result of these deficiencies is that senior management can not make good decisions in the design, implementation and future direction of systems. In most cases, the organizing process is used to produce data that is the site of decision making.
In each case, the time you spend tackle the problems caused by poor processes will be more expensive than the time it takes to establish formal procedures and follow them correctly. To some extent, engineers must change who they are, to accept new ways of doing things.
Finally, I would say that the systems have a trigger similar personality. Standard procedures into the corporate personality or character of the implementation of systems developers is not the individual personality.